Recently a visitor to my blog wrote a comment in one of my entries to share his views and beliefs against the Reformed view of soteriology. One of the nice things and purposes of a blog is to interact, share thoughts, and learn with one another as we seek to grow in our walk with God. I’m thankful to have the opportunity to learn and exchange thoughts with others. So with that in mind, I just wanted to share some of my thoughts and reflections on this subject…
I believe that one of the common objections against the doctrine of God’s sovereign grace in electing sinners often times stems from a misunderstanding of the nature of fallen, sinful human beings. Many believe that human nature, though infected by original sin and the fall, has a neutral free will or perhaps even the inclination to choose good.
Those who reject Calvinism likened the non-believer as a mere patient suffering from an illness (sin) and in need of a cure (the Gospel). They believe that he, just like any other sick person, has the ability to choose to take the medication (e.g. choose God). But this is a wrong analogy. The Bible likened the sinner not to a sick person, but rather a dead person (e.g. spiritually dead in sin). There’s a reason why it uses this analogy. Can a dead person respond to anything? Does a dead man or woman desire to choose life? Well, he or she is dead; they are unaware of their need. The Scripture uses this analogy to point out the impossibility of the sinner to choose God in his spiritual death. That’s why Paul says that though we were once dead to sin, now we are made alive spiritually in Jesus Christ because that is what it takes for God to save us.
The sinner is dead, blind, and deaf to the things of God. He cannot respond to God’s outward call. His heart is deceitful and desperately corrupt. His will is not free; it is in bondage to his evil nature, therefore, he will not — indeed he cannot — choose good over evil in the spiritual realm.
The “Prince of Preachers” Charles Spurgeon said,
“Free will I have often heard of, but I have never seen it. I have met with will, and plenty of it, but it has either been led captive by sin or held in blessed bonds of grace.”
And George Whitefield aptly said:
“Man is nothing: he hath a free will to go to hell, but none to go to heaven … till God worketh in him to will and to do his good pleasure.”
This is precisely why people continue to reject God in their sins, unless God raises them from their death and makes them alive spiritually.
Another common misunderstanding of God’s unconditional election is the assertion that God makes robots out of men in predestining or electing them unto salvation. But, no one goes to heaven kicking and screaming. Allow me to echo the words of Charles Spurgeon when he said, “An Arminian, on his knees, prays desperately like a Calvinist.”
The truth is: we despair of anything other than unmerited, irresistible, sovereign grace as the cause of our salvation. Who of us, when our loved ones are lost as they dangle over the fire of hell, would pray, “O Lord, I know You desire to save my brother John, but he over here has his own free will…” That prayer surely makes God out to be an impotent Savior. I’d venture to say that even when we were Arminians, chances are at some point in our lives, we have pleaded on bended knees before the throne of grace, “O Lord, save my unsaved parents!! Seize them! Draw them with Your cords of love. Pluck them out as a brand from the burning, O Lord!”
Which elect person, when awakened from his spiritual death and shown the depravity of his sinfulness, would choose to return to their dead state of damnation in bondage to sin and reject an eternal bliss of heaven with his Holy Creator? In saving a sinner, the Holy Spirit graciously causes the elect sinner to cooperate, to believe, to repent, to come freely and willingly to Christ.
I praise God that we’re not dependent in any way upon our so called “free will” in order to be saved, for if that were the case, no one would ever be saved! No one would have chosen God in his natural dead state. I thank God that we do not serve an impotent Savior who is limited in His work of applying salvation by man’s will, nor is He dependent upon man’s cooperation for success.
If salvation were in even any minute way (or shape or form) dependent upon the “free will” of man who is dead spiritually, we certainly have room to boast. Consider Charles Spurgeon’s rendition of Arminian prayer to demonstrate the vanity of such a belief:
Fancy him [an Arminian] praying, `Lord, I thank thee I am not like those poor presumptuous Calvinists. Lord, I was born with a glorious free will; I was born with power by which I can turn to thee of myself; I have improved my grace. If everybody had done the same with their grace that I have, they might all have been saved. Lord, I know thou dost not make us willing if we are not willing ourselves. Thou givest grace to everybody; some do not improve it, but I do. There are many that will go to hell as much bought with the blood of Christ as I was; they had as much of the Holy Ghost given to them; they had as good a chance, and were as much blessed as I am. It was not thy grace that made us differ; I know it did a great deal, still I turned the point; I made use of what was given me, and others did not — that is the difference between me and them.’
I am eternally grateful to my Almighty God that salvation is all of Him, beginning to end, top to bottom, inside and out. I have no room to boast. I thank God that He saved me not with the help of my own supposed “glorious free will,” but simply by His glorious, amazing grace.
Thank You, Lord, that when I was dead in sin and could not respond to You, You in Your mercy and grace, raised me alive spiritually by changing my dead cold heart of stone with a new heart of flesh, that I may believe and thus come freely and willingly to Christ.